Talk:Cobitidae
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Rewrite requested: 2006
[edit]The whole article needs a VERY serious rewriting. It is only written under the viewpoint of aquarium-fish keeping, and includes about no scientific or technical data. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.227.175.9 (talk • contribs) 06:41, 25 February 2006 (UTC-7)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cobitidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130211134858/http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/biblio/s26/Conspectus_cobitidum.pdf to http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/biblio/s26/Conspectus_cobitidum.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
January, 2019: Number of species in family, per Catalog of Fishes?
[edit]Should the number of species within Cobitidae, and the number of loach families referenced within Cypriniformes, be updated in keeping with Catalog of Fishes?[1]Davidaboyd (talk) 04:03, 20 January 2019 (UTC) Hello, Davidaboyd. Do you wish to make those changes? Feel free to do so. If citations are an obstacle, you may prefer to mention here which changes the Catalog supports, and someone else will make the changes and cite your source.--Quisqualis (talk) 05:37, 20 January 2019 (UTC)