This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Post-hardcore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of post-hardcore and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Post-hardcoreWikipedia:WikiProject Post-hardcoreTemplate:WikiProject Post-hardcorePost-hardcore articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
I'm not a prominent or advanced, or even mediocre editor, so are there any advanced editors that have edited this page that could possibly create a page for the single "King For A Day"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.223.146.162 (talk) 01:48, 27 April 2013 (UTC) Oh and I apologize that I don't have a name, I am just editing on here. I have many accounts but didn't use one for this request. But my name is Isiah Hilton.[reply]
I disagree with the removal of the tracklist. A lot of FA's (which must rigorously follow the MOS) contain {{tracklist}}. Take A Weekend in the City and Is This It as examples. I know other stuff exists, but, you know. Also the MOS page you are citing is not offically part of the MOS, it is a recommendation by a WikiProject. Insulam Simia (talk·contribs) 20:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]