Talk:Colnect
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
"See also" page
[edit]If anyone else know any wiki articles that talk about the collecting of any collectibles, please feel free to add, thanks! Rubycored (talk) 08:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Statitics table
[edit]This table come from version germany of this hope it is okay now translation
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Colnect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090130111818/http://it.themarker.com:80/tmit/article/3471 to http://it.themarker.com/tmit/article/3471
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Colnect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://it.themarker.com/tmit/article/3471
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090429033415/http://nonickconference.com/2009/04/26/colnect-wins-this-years-startup-20/ to http://nonickconference.com/2009/04/26/colnect-wins-this-years-startup-20/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Deletion?
[edit]@Winged Blades of Godric: I count at least 8 independent sources in this article over a span of 9 years, this article is also available in numerous other language Wikipedia's, how again is this website not notable? --Donald Trung (talk) 19:51, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- I guess we'll have to do a source-specific analysis, esp. in light of this guideline:--
-
- Reference 1 is reliable and covers the subject, prominently.
- Reference 2 and Reference 14 is not reliable.See this policy.
- Reference 3 to Reference 11 and Reference 13 don't contribute an iota to establishment of notability, (obviously) :)
- Reference 12 is typical PR-stuff and per RSN, TechCrunch has a reputation for these.....
- Reference 15 to Reference 18--Typical news-stuff about startup-ecosystem(s) and there is a solid consensus that all these non-notable awards which are covered in non-notable blogs don't lend any to notability. ∯WBGconverse 12:06, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Reference 1 is reliable and covers the subject, prominently.
