Talk:Colour trade mark

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Color High‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Color, a project that provides a central approach to color-related subjects on Wikipedia. Help us improve articles to good and 1.0 standards; visit the wikiproject page for more details.ColorWikipedia:WikiProject ColorTemplate:WikiProject Colorcolor articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Note on creating non-conventional trademark sub-articles

If this article is simply going to imitate the sound trademark article, they both may as well be merged back into the main non-conventional trademark article. 203.198.237.30 02:41, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you should do that. Sound marks and Colour marks are very distinct. The history and rules dealing with both are different.

There is no limit to the amounts of page on wikipedia so no need to condense them into one article. This page was useful for me and I'm sure will be for others.

Why was this article moved?

Is there a reason this article was moved from Colour trademark to Color trademark, in flagrant violation of MoS?
I mean, as an anonymous editor, I lack the ability to enforce MoS and move it back, but I'd love to know why the rules don't apply in this particular case? 139.57.100.104 (talk) 22:22, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A good question. I don't have the time to deal with it (nor am I an admin), but I will support reversing the move if you request an administrator to do so (an admin can do it while keeping the article history in the right place). VMS Mosaic (talk) 05:26, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An admin is necessary for that? I thought anyone with an account could do a page move (even over redirect). 209.90.135.9 (talk) 06:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are right that any account can do a move. I think the one time I tried to undo a move like this, I made a mistake which required an admin to fix. I'd just as soon not experiment again and let someone who knows how do it. VMS Mosaic (talk) 09:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I moved it. The complication I was thinking of was if the redirect page had been edited, but that was not the case here. VMS Mosaic (talk) 09:55, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note: the correct UK term is "colour trade mark" (note space), while the correct US term is "color trademark". The current title is a strange mix of the two. --62.189.73.197 (talk) 15:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Added ENGVAR template to hopefully prevent such moves in the future Acopyeditor (talk) 09:01, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]