Talk:Command & Conquer (1995 video game)/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Electroguv (talk · contribs) 13:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

a (prose):

b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

a (references):

b (citations to reliable sources):

c (OR):

Although Three Speech is associated with Sony, I think a more reliable source is needed.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

a (major aspects):

b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:

Pass/Fail:

This is an easy pass which is only impeded by the above problem. Electroguv (talk) 07:48, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the review. I fixed the issue you pointed out. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 08:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - You must have misunderstood me. I wanted you to replace ThreeSpeech with a more reliable source rather than just improve the footnote. Had to do it myself. Electroguv (talk) 15:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]