Talk:Commercial mail receiving agency

Philately Low‑importance

	Philately portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It looks like Barek has recently destroyed more information contributed by another user (similar to what happened with the online post office article). I thought it was quite interesting that there is legislation mandating the use of "PMB" on addresses. Barek again used rationalization for the removal of some small esoteric detail (one line reference to a vendor) to do a large scale information wipeout. How do we counter or report this kind of behavior? Jgombos (talk) 12:50, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the removal reason more closely - the material was a complete cut/paste from the listed source, a copyright violation plain and simple, which also functioned as an advert for the source of the material (the secondary reason). Copyright is a serious issue, and should not be ignored.

To include the material, a complete re-write would be needed - ideally using a more reliable source. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]