From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Journalism (Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.


spurned sectarianism and religious dogmatism sounds decidedly liberal, almost as if it came from press release?

Have you read a copy? Sounds accurate to me. Pustelnik (talk) 18:56, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
The first commenter is exactly right. The description of the magazine reads like an adulatory press release. And the list of positions intended to illustrate its political diversity is freakin laughable, given that they are pretty much all associated with one side of the political spectrum, excepting perhaps an opposition to abortion, support for which would be a step too far for a magazine that claims to be Catholic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 23:38, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Church standing[edit]

There needs to be information on what is Commonweal's standing with the Church, how many bishops support it, how they have supported it, etc. ADM (talk) 13:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)