Talk:Conor Oberst (album)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Already released on Rhapsody[edit]
Though the release date is Aug 5th, I was already able to get this from Rhapsody (Jul 23). I'm not sure when it was released on Rhapsody though... RobHar (talk) 16:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Review suggestion[edit]
As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this review. However, I'd like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the review and, if he or she sees fit, post it to the professional reviews section. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! (favorable) [1]
Mike harkin (talk) 18:08, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Reception section[edit]
The professional reviews no longer belong ion the infobox but in the reception section in a specific template. Zidane tribal (talk) 04:43, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Conor Oberst (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080827123347/http://crawdaddy.wolfgangsvault.com/reviews/conor-oberst.html to http://crawdaddy.wolfgangsvault.com/reviews/conor-oberst.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 12 August 2017 (UTC)