Talk:Consolidated Fund

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Questions

To what extent is the Consolidated Fund like a bank account the average citizen would be familiar with? Does it for instance have a clearly defined balance that goes up and down with payments in and out? Can I check the balance anywhere? Does the Consolidated Fund have an account number and sort code? Wyddgrug (talk) 07:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The CF does indeed have a balance that goes up and down, but at the end of each day the balance is always zero: see the National Audit Office's Consolidated Fund Account Annual Report, which says "The CF finishes every day with a nil balance on its bank account because any surpluses or deficits are offset by transfers to or from the [National Loans Fund]." As for the NLF, given that the government can create sterling currency at will (which it effectively did under the quantitative easing programme), whether its balance is meaningful is a theoretical question of monetary policy.

Payments from the public purse can only be made by authorization of Parliament (typically in a Finance Act). This has been the case since the Glorious Revolution, long before the Consolidated Fund existed - royal (i.e. government) expenditure without parliamentary approval was one of its causes. As such, I'd speculate that the Bank of England wouldn't have the authority to allow arbitrary payments via an ordinary account number and sort code. It's also worth pointing out that it predates the modern system of account numbers and sort codes so it's probably somewhat special in any case. But this is all speculation on my part. Hairy Dude (talk) 05:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The CF and NLF both end with zero balance at the end of the day. Any deficits result in a transfer of funds from the Debt Management Office's (DMO) account, which will usually be covered by bi-weekly gilt auctions... though, sometimes this doesn't always happen (due to not enough gilts being sold), and so a negative balance remains with the DMO. They are not concerned as 'small deficits' are covered in future auctions.

From this article: "It would be wrong to read anything into the results of one auction event, a Treasury spokesman said, citing recent comments from the head of the DMO. “Demand for gilts clearly remains strong, and the small shortfall in funding today can be made good in future auctions,” he added."

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-markets-gilts-2049-sb-idUKTRE52O2GK20090325

It is clear that this mechanism allows drawings on the CF and NLF to always be successful, and not be limited by negative balances caused by spending in excess of taxation. 2A01:4C8:8A4:A00A:D1B0:95B1:12D5:1B43 (talk) 04:05, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Consolidated Fund. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

General taxation for general spending

From the opening paragraph: "General taxation is taxation paid into the consolidated fund for general spending, as opposed to hypothecated taxes earmarked for specific purposes." - Is there a citation for this? Because if taxation is paid into the account at the end of the day, then its clear that this tax amount would be cleared when it was transferred to the NLF. It is just as valid to say that Taxation is to take back the amounts previously spent from the CF. What would be more correct is simply to say all general taxes are paid into the consolidated fund, and all spending originates from the consolidated fund, without implying one depends on the other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.31.13.38 (talk) 20:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a Citation needed tag requesting someone find out the original source of this. !-- Template:Unsigned IP -->