Talk:Consultant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Business (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Occupations (Rated Start-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of occupations. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Proposed: External links[edit]

SAPexpert 14:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)SAPexpertSAPexpert 14:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Oppose the SAP site. Social netowrking sites are generally not appropriate.Montco 00:35, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Changed derivation from Latin[edit]

See for example dictionary.com and The Quill

Purple Banana 11:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Untidy 'see also' lists[edit]

This list was very untidy. The types of 'Consultants' referenced does not seem to be definitive, but I have split the concepts and the consultant types. Further concepts and consultant types could probably be appropriately added.

Adrest4 (talk) 10:46, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

edit this article[edit]

This is a great article and give me some definition of the different of kind of consultantNoeer Alotaibi (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

This is a great article--Noeer Alotaibi (talk) 03:25, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Image to the article[edit]

I was surprised by the image added to this article. As the image use policy suggests "the purpose of an image is to increase readers' understanding of the article's subject matter, usually by directly depicting people, things, activities, and concepts described in the article. The relevant aspect of the image should be clear and central".

As (the) "man delivering a presentation" on the picture doesn't appear to be a notable figure, there is no objective reason for displaying this picture.

Should an image be relevant to increase readers' understanding of the consultant concept, I would rather suggest to display a world famed consultant (for instance a profile like Peter Drucker known as "the Father of Modern Management Consulting"[1] or Frederick Winslow Taylor or ...

I hope no injury was done to any particular interests by removing this picture.--JCL16 (talk) 08:03, 29 August 2017 (UTC)