Talk:Consumer confidence index
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Needs attention
[edit]I tagged this article for attention, because it's a bit meager, and I think this is a relatively important subject, as I seem to hear this term all the time on the news ;x. Subversive 04:21, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Right On! One year later, no progress. Make sense to remove the tag. Dilane 04:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Re June 30 2009 responses: How do you know if the 5,000 consumers are not lying?59.164.123.101 (talk) 16:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
consumer confidence -v- consumer sentiment
[edit]What is the difference between consumer confidence and consumer sentiment? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.6.45.163 (talk) 09:46, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- No reply in over two years, I see. A distinction without a difference? Paul Magnussen (talk) 16:19, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
A bit POV?
[edit]In the most simplistic terms, when their confidence is trending up, consumers spend money, indicating a healthy economy. When confidence is trending down, consumers are saving more than they are spending, indicating the economy is in trouble.
It is good that this passage qualifies itself by stating "In the most simplistic terms", but it seems to be both a bit inaccurate and a bit POV. Suppose that an economy is at risk of inflation, then a drop in consumer confidence would be a sign that there will be lower risk of inflation, and hence the economy would be less likely to be in trouble. Woood (talk) 11:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Adding globalise tag to article
[edit]Many countries in the world have a "Consumer confidence index", and the article needs to have information on the way other countries gather their Consumer Confidence Index statistics. I'm adding a globalise tag to this article. Kbbbb (talk) 15:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Chart in error?
[edit]The labels chart on the chart of consumer confidence over time are apparently off by one year. For example, where the label says 1.12.2008, the data is from one year later than that (1.12.2009).
Looking at the labels on the chart, it would appear that consumer confidence hit a bottom in very early 2008 and rose the rest of 2008. That is actually the pattern from 2009. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.98.117.163 (talk) 22:54, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Consumer confidence index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120220035902/http://www.stateofeconomy.com/charts/consumer_confidence_average to http://www.stateofeconomy.com/charts/consumer_confidence_average
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131018095501/http://marshallplace.com.au:80/consumer-confidence to http://www.marshallplace.com.au/consumer-confidence
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160216001248/http://www.bostonanalytics.com/india_watch/india_watch.html to http://www.bostonanalytics.com/india_watch/india_watch.html
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120423181510/http://www.bi.go.id:80/web/en/Publikasi/Survei/Survei+Konsumen to http://www.bi.go.id/web/en/Publikasi/Survei/Survei+Konsumen/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)