Gastropods Low‑importance

	Gastropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gastropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of gastropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GastropodsWikipedia:WikiProject GastropodsTemplate:WikiProject GastropodsGastropods articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taxonomy: For all marine species, Project Gastropods uses the taxonomy in the online database WoRMS. When starting a new article, do not use sources of taxonomic information that predate the 2017 revision for all gastropod groups ("Revised Classification, Nomenclator and Typification of Gastropod and Monoplacophoran Families" by Philippe Bouchet & Jean-Pierre Rocroi, Bernhard Hausdorf, Andrzej Kaim, Yasunori Kano, Alexander Nützel, Pavel Parkhaev, Michael Schrödl and Ellen E. Strong in Malacologia, 2017, 61(1–2): 1–526.) (can be dowloaded at Researchgate.net), substituting the previous classification of 2005 Taxonomy of the Gastropoda (Bouchet & Rocroi, 2005). If you need help with any aspect of an article, please leave a note at the Project talk page.

Fatalities

The body count listed here contradicts with that of the main Cone Snail article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cone_snail#Harpoon_and_venoms 198.187.174.15 (talk) 19:49, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shell description

Is the word 'obsolete' a mistake? ('Oblique', maybe?) Notreallydavid (talk) 10:48, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a mistake. "Obsolete" means here "less developed, rudimentary; vestigial" JoJan (talk) 13:34, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Venom

"...These estimates make the geographic cone snail the most venomous animal in the world". Two points about this:

The references given don't seem to mention any comparison with other venoms, so statement seems to be OR
There is more to being "most venomous" than the potency per mg of the venom - it clearly also depends on the quantity of venom typically injected. I don't know but it seems likely that, e.g., some snakebites are more likly to kill than a cone snail envenomation.

I will remove the quoted sentence if no justification for it is given.Newburyjohn (talk) 17:11, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Yoshiba estimated an LD50 of 0.001-0.003 mg/kg. In two cases of envenomation, only 0.0002-0.0005 mg resulted in severe paralysis." That should be 0.0002-0.0005 mg/kg, shouldn't it? And "Yoshiba" needs a reference.DKMell (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cigarette snail

I tried to add that it's called the ciagarette snail because it's so venomous that if struck the victim will only have enough time to enjoy one last cigarette before dying, and given that there are no known treatments, it is the deadliest animal in the world. When I added that information it was reverted by a bot and a site admin said if I contradicted the bot again I'd be banned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.240.195.4 (talk) 21:27, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's because you haven't bothered to provide a WP:SOURCE to demonstrate that this is a truthful claim.--Mr Fink (talk) 22:23, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]