Talk:Critical code studies

CCS Working Group 2012

Full disclosure, I'm currently taking part in a working group on CCS. A number of its participants are likely to be dropping by to edit this article; they should all read WP:COI and clearly identify themselves as involved in the field. TallNapoleon (talk) 06:38, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's a good point, TallNapoleon. Reliance on journalistic references to CCS (in The Chronicle and/or Inside Higher Ed) will also be another way to assess the importance of CCS within academia. (I'm also participating in the CCS working group, but deliberately left the article a stub when I created it. I'm interested in seeing whether, as it develops, it can pass muster with the Wikipedia community.) Dennis G. Jerz (talk) 07:24, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Full disclosure -- I'm mentioned in the article, I am co-organizer of the Working Group, and I coined the phrase "Critical Code Studies." I'm going to add some notes here that people can review for their relevance to the article. First, here are a few references: I'll begin with my own since they tend to explicitly mention CCS and since I have them here. Some of these may be more resources than references. electronic book review has published a series of posts that grew out of discussion threads from the Critical Code Studies Working group. There are 4 weeks of the 6 weeks published as edited threads. The discussion threads and proceedings are multi-authored. I have to check Wikipedia's policy on whether proceedings can be considered a reference. Markcmarino (talk) 04:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recommendation: Rather than linking the project to cybertext, or in addition to, it's clearer to link it to: Cultural Studies (treading code as a cultural not literary text), Media Specific Analysis (as used by N. Katherine Hayles), and the other branches of MSA: software studies, platform studies, media forensics, and media archaeology. Markcmarino (talk) 05:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some Recommended References and Resources

Marino, Mark C. “Critical Code Studies and the electronic book review: An Introduction.” electronic book review (2010): n. pag. Web. 31 May 2011. First Person.
“Critical Code Studies Conference - Week One Discussion - Mark C. Marino.” Web. 3 Feb. 2012.
Marino, Mark, and Max Feinstein. “Critical Code Studies Conference - Week Two Introduction.” electronic book review (2011): n. pag. Web. 31 May 2011. First Person.
Douglass, Jeremy. “Critical Code Studies Conference - Week Two Discussion.” electronic book review n. pag. Web. 31 May 2011. First Person.

This was one of the articles that analyzes 10 PRINT which fed into the book project mentioned in the post.
Marino, Mark C. “The ppg256 Perl Primer.” Emerging Language Practices Issue 1 (2010): n. pag. Web. 31 May 2011.

In Thoughtmesh, you will find published proceedings from the CCS 2010 conference at USC.
ThoughtMesh: Critical Code Studies. Critical Code Studies 2010 Conference Proceedings. University of Southern California: Vectors, 2010. Web. 31 May 2011. The proceedings of that conference can be found here: http://vectorsjournal.org/thoughtmesh/critcode Markcmarino (talk) 04:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll return with links to all of these. They are all in open-access journals online. Markcmarino (talk) 04:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This post should either be Title Case: Critical Code Studies or lower case: critical code studies. Not a mix. Markcmarino (talk) 00:46, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Critical code studies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110127183751/http://lab.softwarestudies.com/2008/11/softbook.html to http://lab.softwarestudies.com/2008/11/softbook.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]