Talk:Criticism of the Anti-Defamation League

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Anti-Defamation League.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Anti-Defamation League#Criticism]] The anchor (#Criticism) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

This page was created on the model of other organization pages see:Human Rights Watch on which the volume of criticism can overwhelm the page.Historicist (talk) 18:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your speedy deletion tagging of Criticism of Anti-Defamation League

This is not really criticism, but an article about such criticism, as a branch off of the main article, Anti-Defamation League. Such practice is common to keep articles as short as possible, especially if the new sub-article has enough content, references and notability to merit its own article anyway. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 17:47, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should reconsider. Controversial organizations that do good work, like the ADL and Human rights Watch attract critics who overwhelm their pages. User:Cobaltbluetony is quite correct in pointing out that its is routine solution.Historicist (talk) 18:01, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the above copied from the talk page of User:Hellinabucket Historicist (talk) 18:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

This page was created by cutting and pasting the criticism section on the ADL page. It is far form NPOV.Historicist (talk) 18:20, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]