This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
I can't believe that the pseudo-code is efficient; finding the optimal choice of the sampled points, i.e., the maximal one, seems much easier than sorting the array of all sampled points, yet the pseudo-code does the sort instead of finding the maximum.
@Allndon What is it your objection? You sounded like making a personal comment, not an objective constructive suggestion,
This is a well-established technique with sound peer-review references. I am removing the banner.
mcyp (talk) 01:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]