Jump to content

Talk:Cross (association football)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linking to cricket?

[edit]

The links for outswinger and inswinger lead to pages about cricket. Maybe somebody with a clue or two could change this? TIA --78.52.5.141 (talk) 11:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


That is true. Instead, each type of cross (eg Low cross, curved cross, chip etc) needs to be analysed. Anyone, who is an expert, care to express themselves? I have decided (I am not expert, unfortunately) to expand on this, but these are uncited hypothetical statements, yet to be proven or theorised. I added some points that need to confirmed, and I understand that the language is rudimentary, but at least I tried to expand the stale stub. Maybe the changes are too hasty and may be reverted, but revision is the key in my opinion. (Lord Shivan (talk) 06:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Help

[edit]

This article needs to be improved. The current statements are un-cited and are mere hypothesis. Diagrams illustrating the positions of the players while a cross occurring is an idea I have, and more deep and concise paragraphs too. Lord Shivan (talk) 00:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]