Jump to content

Talk:Cycling organization

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion[edit]

(was: This page should not be speedy deleted because... )

This page should not be speedily deleted because it only APPEARS to duplicate bicycle club. Please read carefully. Full fledged associations have little similarity to clubs, although they may have been derived from some. I promise to make the distinction clearer, if you do not interfere for a while. If you are not convinced, please take inspiration from the apparent distinction between automobile club and automobile association. There was also a reason for other colleagues here to emphasize the distinction between Category:Cycling organizations by country‎ and Category:Cycling clubs‎.

And, since you keep changing your threat templates:

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because (see above) and if people do not let the creation of a "relevant page history" happen, your deletion threat will always be self-fulfilling. --Kku (talk) 12:40, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are no threat templates, so chill out. However, this is virtually the same and is nothing more than an attempt to promote bikemunk. Praxidicae (talk) 12:53, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I do not in any way appreciate the use of slang in this situation. There isn't even a word like bikemunk. What are you even trying to say? Did you read both articles? Did you consider the common distinction people make between associations and clubs? Whatever I wanted to achieve, it wasn't what you (I think) try to insinuate. Please stay serious. -- Kku (talk) 12:57, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So the spamblog that is used to source the entire thing isn't called bikemunk.com? There was nothing joking about my last edit, however I would appreciate if you would tone down the hostility a bit, no one threatened you. Praxidicae (talk) 13:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I myself find it just a tad offensive to assume I was in any way associated with some kind of spam website. Thank you, too. Glad we talked about it.-- Kku (talk) 15:59, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]