Talk:Cyclopentadienyl complex

Cleaning up citations as best I can

…and adding tags. While the list of resources is superb, and I take no umbrage to content, the original editors or others committed to forensic work must return here and give the article further attention: there is no current connection whatsoever to the content appearing, and the resources listed. Bottom line, the content, as it stands, in unverifiable, and therefore violates WP policies regarding sourcing and verifiability. I will do what I can, but the individual with these books, that knows what material was drawn from where, must expend the effort that should have been done with the original posting. This is an article, and not a sandbox, an encyclopedia, not a personal set of class noted. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 22:23, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since no bracketed ref… /ref markup language appears in the article, and the sole attempt to link text to a citation is to a book (Crabtree) with no page numbers given, I am adding a ref list construction, moving the book list to further reading, and looking to add some real references (though this will not be instantly). Patience, with these WP required changes to this unreferenced entry-level article. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 22:31, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thought needs to be given to image appearing

While I am a big fan of bent metallocenes (as a grad school chum and his mentors did seminal on the theory and experiment on why certain ones are bent), the appearance of only a bent metallocene here, and of no traditional sandwich compound with ligands near to being in parallel planes—this is a curious, and possibly questionable choice (for an encyclopedia). Proposal: Two structures, one of each "type" should appear, with the parallel first, and suitable explanation. Comments? Cheers. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 22:27, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]