Talk:DJ Hero/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   I only came across one prose error, a simple mistake in the reception section: "The omission of a practice mode we noted by Dameon Hatfield of IGN". Other than that, fine.

   B. MoS compliance:

   There's a few instances of "Guitar Hero" not be italicised, and a few bits of overlinking with artists such as "DJ Shadow", "DJ AM" and "Daft Punk" in the development and soundtrack sections.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Only thing that concerns me here is the use of jargon like "turntablism". I know there's a link to an article, but it might be helpful to provide a very quickfire explanation to the term upon its first use, so readers still have an idea what the term means without clicking the link.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   There's just a small number minor niggling issues to deal with, otherwise the article is very well put together and is easily a GA.

Reviewer: Sabre (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

I got the basic issues above taken care of, and added some text about turntablism, crossfading, and scratching. Please take a look and see if you need more. --MASEM (t) 16:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Aye, that's fine. Article passed. -- Sabre (talk) 20:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC)