Talk:De re militari

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the De re militari article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Roman & Byzantine / Classical / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Patronage

In the article it states that Vegetius was probably under patronage of Theodosius, but the prefaces of the books in the English translation are addressed towards Valentinian, more than likely Valentinian II, who co-ruled with Theodosius. Is there any further evidence to suggest his patron?--2ltben 23:18, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See Vegetius, where I have added some material on this point. -- llywrch 19:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a reference there and expanded the section a little, to make the two manuscript traditions clearer, I hope. This present article exists to please disinfoboxmakers: Vegetius and his manuscript can't usefully be separated. --Wetman 20:10, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Art of War

The Art of War was written by Sun-tzu, not Machiavelli.

71.77.144.114 (talk) 02:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you shouldn't be posting here. You obvious have no clue what you're talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.209.199.204 (talk) 00:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep the comment re Sun Tzu is ignorant beyond belief.... Tentsmuir (talk) 17:36, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Broken links?

I've found at least a couple of broken links on this page. I've looked up the subject in the editor guidelines but can find no general guidelines on what to do with those links, so I've fixed them where I can and removed the following, which I can find no replacement link for:

Faber, Colonel Peter, USAF (2002). "Strategy: Its Intellectual Roots and Its Current Status" (PDF). PUBLICATIONS - NDC OCCASIONAL PAPERS ARCHIVE 2004. NATO Defense College.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

If anyone can give me advice on guidelines for broken links, it would be much appreciated.

Cadar (talk) 12:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]