Talk:Deep-sea gigantism

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 July 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 August 2020 and 10 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Angelllllmoore. Peer reviewers: Staveras25, Cemacquarrie, MitchG265.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:12, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

I had to delete this:

But research has shown that it is all just a lie. Fish do not really exist and neither do we. It is all just a big lie created to give us comfort in knowing that there is a point to living.

. . . but it was with some regret. Iralith 20:32, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Edits

Hey, there really is no such thing as a fish, according to cladistics. Not unless we are fish, which gives extra point to the regretfully deleted assertion that neither fish nor we exist.

But seriously, folks, most extreme? Gimme a break. That's more unique than something that's a little bit infinite. Or, as a Disney short asserted many years ago, "This factory [for curling stones] is so unique that there is only one other in the world."

More seriously yet: I re-arrangeded the items in the lead sentence for a reason: Isopods are Crustaceans. Look it up. Hence, including them after "and various invertebrates" is badly misleading if not just plain wrong. Sheesh, what do I care about abyssal gigantism, anyway? Dandrake 00:46, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC)

Fish?

Sorry to raise another fish question, but if this phenomenon affects invertibrates but explicitly not fish, why is the oarfish one of our examples? --Iustinus 02:42, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is it just me?...

...Or does that picture look really fake? Maybe it's jsut the lighting, but something about it seems off. In all respects, we should probably just get a better picture anyways. --Wikiwøw 23:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks very real to me. Mgiganteus1 00:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Blue Planet series was not created by David Attenborough, it was simply narrated by him. David Attenborough has however created the "Life" series. 82.41.10.157 (talk) 10:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What?

"It is not known[citation needed]"

Do you really need to cite a source for a LACK of knowledge? I can understand that claims need sources...but no claim is being made, just an admission that there is a lack of knowledge. EvaXephon (talk) 03:45, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cause unknown?

I know this isn't the forum for it, but… I always thought they are bigger because they have more space. 80.98.146.68 (talk) 09:34, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deep-sea gigantism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131031234950/http://www.sb-roscoff.fr/Ecchis/pdf/10-Bright-OMBAR.pdf to http://www.sb-roscoff.fr/Ecchis/pdf/10-Bright-OMBAR.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What happened on 8/29?

This page just suddenly got almost 10,000 pageviews. What happened? -Aven Az13 (talk) 00:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What happened on July 30, when we got almost 100,000? It must have received mention somewhere. WolfmanSF (talk) 04:01, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pressure

I thought that is was the pressure that was making them get bigger because I thought it was like a vacuum chamber, inflating them. IdkWhatToNames (talk) 21:22, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]