Talk:Denavit–Hartenberg parameters

I have upload an image to show the DH parameters

See this image below: Is it possible to add to the main page? Ollydbg (talk) 03:29, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi, since I see that there are two kind of DH parameters convention, so I create another one, see

, in-fact, the French version of this wiki has those two convention explained, so I think it should be useful to put those two images in the main wiki page. Ollydbg (talk) 15:03, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Denavit-Hartenberg Tutorial Video.ogv Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Denavit-Hartenberg Tutorial Video.ogv, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:11, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Error in page

The statement "An important property of Denavit and Hartenberg matrices is $M_{ij}^{-1}=M_{ji}$ is wrong, if I understand correctly.

The inverse of $M=\left[{\begin{array}{c|c}R&t\\\hline 0&1\end{array}}\right]$ should be $M^{-1}=\left[{\begin{array}{c|c}R^{T}&-R^{T}t\\\hline 0&1\end{array}}\right]$ , where $R$ is an orthogonal matrix and $t$ is a vector.

The transpose $M^{T}$ would not have $t$ in the proper location.

Chris2crawford (talk) 18:57, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

No comments ... I went ahead and corrected it.

Chris2crawford (talk) 13:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Revisions to this article

I would propose revising this article to shorten the lead and define the various conventions associated with Denavit-Hartenberg parameters. Prof McCarthy (talk) 19:02, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

I increased the importance of this article because this is the primary mathematical tool used to monitor and control the configuration of a robot. Prof McCarthy (talk) 06:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Probably an error in inertia component formula

There is this formula in Dynamics section: $I_{xx}=\int \int x^{2}\,dm$

I have a feeling it should be $I_{xx}=\int \int (y^{2}+z^{2})\,dm$. At least that is what it is for a normal inertia tensor, right? --Sindar (Синдар) (talk) 23:48, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Material copied to wikiversity

I am working on a robotics course on wikiversity, and I am copying content to the following: https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Robotic_Mechanics_and_Modeling/Kinematics Thank you. Admazzeo (talk) 05:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Material copied to this page as well: https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Robotic_Mechanics_and_Modeling/Dynamics

Admazzeo (talk) 13:36, 5 March 2020 (UTC)