User talk:Ollydbg

Welcome!

Hello, Ollydbg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Allocator(C++STL), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! flaming lawyer 06:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Allocator(C++STL)

A tag has been placed on Allocator(C++STL) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. flaming lawyer 06:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DHParameter.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DHParameter.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:52, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:DHParameter.png

Thank you for uploading File:DHParameter.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

~~If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.~~

~~If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:08, 8 January 2011 (UTC)~~[reply]

Resolved, typo in permission field? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:29, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks, Yes, there is a typo in the field, and I found that you has fixed it. thanks!!! Ollydbg (talk) 02:40, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Robotics article

Yes, it's easy to revert to specific earlier versions of an article, so I've gone ahead and done this. Thanks for clarifying what was going on here, and good luck with any future Wikipedia projects - drop me a line if you have any questions or need any pointers. --McGeddon (talk) 17:50, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you, I will ask my students to see whether they have other wrong modifications to any other wiki pages. Ollydbg (talk) 23:52, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]