Talk:Description
Appearance
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untrue sentences
[edit]"The following two sentences are untrue. The word description can be used interchangeably with the word theory in physics. When an observer is said to describe an event, experiment, or observation, this is a direct reference, which means a theory describes the event, experiment, or observation." A quite peculiar form of expressing one's disagreement, I'd say. --Oop (talk) 03:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- These statements have now been removed.—Anita5192 (talk) 04:53, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Bertie
[edit]Since Bertie Russell's 'classical texts' are mentioned they should get proper references. 31.52.255.231 (talk) 11:46, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- If you read the Philosophy section carefully, you will see that Bertrand Russell's classical texts are already linked as the nature of description. That article has the references you seek.—Anita5192 (talk) 15:38, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Society and social sciences
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- Start-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class logic articles
- Low-importance logic articles
- Logic task force articles