Talk:Digging for the Truth

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Digging for the Truth Renewed?

Just noticed this little change and thought there should probably be a source. I haven't heard anything of the sort, although I might not be looking in the right places.

Regards, -KA

Criticism of the Show

Some people (including myself) are very critical of the overall lack of skepticism presented in the show. Often prevailing theories are ignored if they are controversial. (For example, even though no reputable historian pays any credence to the story of Lot, Josh barely mentioned that and proceeded as if it were historical fact.) It would be nice if someone could find a verifiable source of such criticism so it could be included here for the sake of completeness. The best source I've found is an article on About.com that briefly mentions that archaeologists are not sold on the show, but it's second-hand and isn't much to begin with. This could easily be balanced with praise from the media, as the show has received excellent reviews. Sm5574 04:24, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]