Talk:Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Meryam90 (talk · contribs) 13:41, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Links[edit]
- All links are working fine (no dead links).
- Well written.
- - the prose is clear and concise and the spelling and grammar are correct. Generally very well written, nice rhymn to the sentences, generaly easy to read though the sentence Films like this that are designed to appeal to the diaspora have stories involving foreign locations, but not just for item numbers. somehow bothers me.
- - Respects copyright laws. The duplication detector show a reasonably low number of matches.
- - It complies with the WP:MOS for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Although the lead should probably include some portion about the awards/ critical reception.
- My two cents
This is very well written. I am impressed. A pleasure to read. Little copy editing for me to do. MathewTownsend (talk) 03:53, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lead section
- Soundtrack
- Use the template:track listing for the tracks. ASHUIND 05:48, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Awards
Just a concern
- Every award won is given a reference in the article. Here I don't see a single reference for any win. ASHUIND 05:48, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Citation added. I may add some more later, but the citations should already be in the respective award articles. BollyJeff || talk 15:40, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Final Analysis[edit]
- It is generally well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: