Talk:Dirty Work (All Time Low album)

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Colwell, Matthew (July 3, 2012). "Interview: All Time Low's Alex Gaskarth on signing with Hopeless". Alternative Press. Alternative Press Magazine, Inc. Archived from the original on April 4, 2013. Retrieved August 30, 2013. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; April 3, 2013 suggested (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
http://www.theaquarian.com/2013/04/24/interview-with-all-time-low-rising-to-the-top/
http://www.gigwise.com/features/79603/All-Time-Low-%27We%27re-coming-back-stronger-than-ever%27
https://web.archive.org/web/20120607084931/http://www.absolutepunk.net:80/showthread.php?t=2770412
https://web-beta.archive.org/web/20120806064003/http://www.purevolume.com:80/news/All-Time-Low-Alex-Gaskarth-PureVolume-Exclusive-Interview
http://www.altpress.com/features/entry/interview_alex_gaskarth_of_all_time_low_on_the_brave_the_reckless
https://web.archive.org/web/20120924130841/http://hangout.altsounds.com/features/141841-altsounds-top-50-albums-2011-part-3-a.html
Winberg, Pär (June 21, 2011). "All Time Low - Dirty Work". Melodic. Retrieved July 17, 2017.
http://www.deadpress.co.uk/10307/interview-all-time-low-o2-apollo-manchester-21012012
https://www.kerrang.com/features/why-its-time-to-reappraise-all-time-lows-misunderstood-classic-dirty-work

Untitled

THIS ALBUM HAS RECEIVED "GENERALLY FAVORABLE" REVIEWS: http://www.metacritic.com/music/dirty-work — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.125.141 (talk) 20:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TMR? Really?

First off, I never knew TMR existed before seeing their review of this album.

Second off, it's pretty damn clear that whoever reviewed the album listened only to "I Feel Like Dancin'" and judged the entire album off of that. There is no mention of any of their other songs, he only goes on and on about how their first single off of the record is garbage. Beyond that, he spends half of his review bashing All Time Low specifically, which has nothing to do with the album that he is reviewing. The review is unfair, arbitrary, and extraordinarily biased--so why is it put with the other reviews? Does it really deserve to be there when it was hardly a review in the first place? I think that the reviews that are put there should be of sites that actually reviewed the album, not of sites that bash a single track and never truly evaluate anything at all. 99.40.186.120 (talk) 05:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Genre

I really don't feel this album contained much pop punk elements at all. it was pop, pop rock, powerpop, etc. there was nothing punk about this album except maybe timebomb, one song. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.239.116 (talk) 20:48, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]