Jump to content

Talk:Distancing (psychology)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Currently

[edit]

Peer Review 1

[edit]

1. Quality of Information: 2 Solid information, well referenced.

2. Article size: 2 - Meets requirement set by Dr. Potter.

3. Readability: 2 - Worded in terms such that a layperson would understand.

4. Refs: 2 - Meets minimum requirement set by Dr. Potter

5. Links: 2 - Links to other Wikipedia articles are adequate.

6. Responsive to comments: 2 - No comments are present.

7. Formatting: 2 - Arranged in sensible order.

8. Writing: 2 - Well written.

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2 - Real name was used as user account.

10. Outstanding?: 2 - Neat topic that is well referenced :)

Total: 20/20

Skarthikeyan3 (talk) 03:41, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review 2

[edit]

1. Factual and Encyclopedic Information: 2 - Well referenced and up to date information

2. Length: 2 - Within the set limit

3. Readable: 2 - Easy to read and follow

4. References: 2 - at least 10 references

5. Links: 2 - adequately linked to other pages

6. Talk Page: 2 - There were no comments to respond to

7. Formatting: 1 - Well formatted, but I feel that there needs to be more information on what type of children have to go through distancing

8. Writing: 2 - well written, well researched, verifiable, good grammar

9. Used real name: 2

10. Outstanding: 2 - interesting article that was easy to read

Total: 19/20

Mahwish Khan (talk) 02:24, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review 3

[edit]

1. Quality of Information: 2 - Both abundant and clear

2. Article Size: 2

3. Readability: 2 - Very easy to understand. The ideas are explained in a clear and compact way.

4. References: 2

5. Links: 2 - Lots of interesting related topics

6. Responsiveness: 2

7. Formatting: 2 - Organized and doesn't feel like a block of text. Capitalize headings/subheadings?

8. Writing: 2 - Very well written.

9. Real Name: 2

10. Outstanding: 2 - I see this as a gold standard for what wikipedia pages should look like. 10/10 would read again.

Total: 20/20 - But seriously that was immaculate.

Rkasinadhuni3 (talk) 23:01, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


- Response: All children experience distancing, it is a part of normal development. Headings should also be in lowercase letters unless they are proper nouns. JahedaK (talk) 8 December 2013 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:36, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]