Talk:Don't Forget About Us/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Calvin • 999 09:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC) Will start after Glitter
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Info box
- No issues
- Lead info
"It was written and produced by Carey, Jermaine Dupri, Bryan-Michael Cox and Johntá Austin," → The info box and the TEOM article says that Johntá Austin didn't produce the song. I know you say "Co-produced by the former three," in the next line, but this should be re-worded to come before, because it's misleading."Additionally, the song placed on the set-lists of Carey's The Adventures of Mimi and Angels Advocate Tours." → "Additionally, the song was included on..."
- Background and recording
Block quote doesn't need quotation marks.
- Composition
"Written and produced by Carey, Jermaine Dupri, Bryan-Michael Cox and Johntá Austin," → Austin didn't produce.
- Critical reception
- No issues
- Chart performance
""Don't Forget About Us" was released as the fourth international single from The Emancipation of Mimi (2005), and the first from its re-release, the Ultra Platinum Edition." → Source?
- Music video - Background
"In an interview, Carey described" → Interview with who?Block quote doesn't need quotation marks.
- Music video - Synopsis
- No issues
- Remixes
- "and featuring Fabolous and Styles P," → Don't need "and"
- The 'and' is needed. They are two different people.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 21:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
- Live performances
"accepting the first award of the evening.[31]" → The first award of the evening or Mariah's first award of the evening? Also, I assume she won more than one? State how many.- She won one award, and it was the first of the evening. She received it right after opening the show with DFAU.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 21:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
- Formats and track listings
- No issues
- Credits and personnel
- No issues
- Charts
- No issues
- References
- One dead link
- Its not a dead-link Calvin. Red is dead. Take a look.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 21:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
- It is. Ref 47 is highlighted red. Calvin • 999 21:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
- Its not a dead-link Calvin. Red is dead. Take a look.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 21:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Great article, hardly anything to ammend :) Calvin • 999 21:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! All done :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 21:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
- Responded to two points which are highlighted in bold. And I haven't actually passed it yet, just looked on your user page ;). Calvin • 999 21:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
- Passed.
- Responded to two points which are highlighted in bold. And I haven't actually passed it yet, just looked on your user page ;). Calvin • 999 21:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC)