Talk:Don Tallon with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll be reviewing this shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 23:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Specific concerns

• Not enough to not pass the article, but the long strings of citations are really ugly. Can't something be done about them?
• As usual, jargon heavy. It'll get dinged at FAC. Yada, yada, yada, we've been here before ...

Neither of these are enough to keep the article from passing, so I'm passing it now. Ealdgyth - Talk 23:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)