Jump to content

Talk:Doug Mastriano/Archives/2023/August

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Not a far right politician

If Wikipedia has a policy on keeping a neutral point of view, why is he labeled far-right? That is as biased as it gets. And why aren't some liberals labeled as far-left? 173.62.201.143 (talk) 00:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Please actually read WP:NPOV. It starts All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. That's why. Reliable sources refer to Mastriano as "far right". They do not refer to liberals as "far left" because liberalism is not "far left". – Muboshgu (talk) 00:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Ah yes, the famously reliable sources that said that Russia stole the 2016 election, that white people are all racist, that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and that Daryl Brooks isn't a far-left black nationalist. I see absolutely nothing wrong with unquestionably believing the lies of left-wing partisan hacks. 2600:4040:445D:C200:E125:82B9:5E0D:B414 (talk) 02:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
It sounds like Wikipedia may not be for you. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 02:26, 15 August 2023 (UTC)