Talk:Dr. Heidegger's Experiment

Novels: Short story / 19th century Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Short story task force.
	This article is supported by 19th century task force.

Please expand

Will someone with more experience please expand this stub? Thanks
WiiWillieWiki 14:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Figurative Language?

I'm not 100% sure if this can be taken as fact, but my language arts teacher mentioned that Hawthorne's works such as Dr. Heidegger's Experiment can be interpreted figuratively to change the meaning. When we went over this story in class, she said that the story was actually about Dr. Heidegger giving his friends plain liquor and them believing it was working. I'm not sure if that's correct, though. Should I add it in? Hannah Kerela 02:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It could be a good idea, as long as you are to specify that it is an interpretation, and not try to pass it off as a fact, which from your wording it seems your teacher tried to do. Metall pingwin (talk) 16:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nationalistic period?

The article says this story "reflects the Nationalistic period, where the strange and picturesque were incorporated in many of the authors of the time." Which Nationalistic period does this refer to? I'm presuming it's something to do with America, but I'm sort of confused because nationalism implies something to do with politics. Kennard2 00:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Characters?

I'm curious as to the validity of character descriptions. For example, the story never specifically says how Mr. Medbourne comes to lose his money, aside from that it was due to frantic speculation. Much less does the tale evolve a subplot of his gambling and denial thereof. Metall pingwin (talk) 16:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability

The reliability of the page on a whole seems debatable. In the intro, it says something about the short being first published in "twice told stories," then, in the notes it claims it were published elsewhere. Also, grammar and spelling seem on the downside. I'm too lazy to change it... KuroAi15 (talk) 02:02, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dr. Heidegger's Experiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140808044534/http://castroller.com/podcasts/StrangeTalesOld/2881677 to http://castroller.com/podcasts/StrangeTalesOld/2881677

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]