Talk:Duplex worm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Translation into English[edit]

This page would probably benefit from some love and attention as there are some slight problems with the translation from German. I have done some work on it, but until I read about Duplex Worms in another source there are some parts whose meanings I could not be sure I was changing for the worse. There is probably an info box for this somewhere, I'll dig it up. BananaFiend (talk) 17:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Duplex worm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:32, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

long time I didn't take care about the Duplex_worm article. Normally it was stable and complete. Only today I noticed that the original PDF file that I published in 1991 disappeared from it's storage area at I stopped working for this company, so I don't know why the PDF file with the reference text was deleted. Thanks to User:InternetArchiveBot having replaced the file by the archived one on the at And thanks to User:Alexf for replacing my change. I am sorry, that I thought that it would be better to save the PDF to my own web space.

Saving to your own webspace is not acceptable as a source in Wikipedia. It looks like you are spamming your own website, which you effectively are, even if that was not your intention. -- Alexf(talk) 16:41, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Are you sure that the actual storing place of the PDF file at is ok for future? If so, I will proceed in the same manner with the german version of the file. In the german article the original PDF file was replaced by a worm catalogue which doesn't match the original version of the publication at all. --Rauhut (talk) 16:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC)