Talk:Edict of Torda/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 14:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

I'll review this over the next several days. --14:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Checklist

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

Images

• All are properly licensed and appropriate for the article

Lede

• Good summary, no changes needed.

Background

• I would link burghers

Toward tolerance

• No changes needed, but I would make the word "jizya" appear in the text, not just the link, if I were you. It's nothing to stand in the way of the GA nomination, just my opinion.

John Sigismund, Dávid and Biandrata

• "denominational flexibility": this is a quote, but it's not clear who said it. A historian? If so, name that person.

The Edict

• This section is fine, no changes needed

Everything else looks good to me. After these minor issues are addressed, I'll be happy to promote this article. --Coemgenus (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you four your review. I modified the article in accordance with your above suggestion. Please let me know if any further action is needed. Borsoka (talk) 03:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Looks great, I'll promote it right away. Nice work! --Coemgenus (talk) 18:51, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you again for the review. I highly appreciate your hard work. Borsoka (talk) 03:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)