Talk:Emergency ascent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Talk:Emergency ascent (diving))
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Scuba diving (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Scuba diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
 

Merger proposal[edit]

Controlled emergency swimming ascent is a subtopic of this article, and the current independent article is a small stub, unlikely to expand much. The content is already mostly in this article, which provides the context. I recommend a merge and redirect. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 10:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Controlled buoyant lift is a small stub, and the topic is a legitimate subtopic of this article as it is also a form of emergency ascent. This article is not too big to include the two proposed for merge - they will improve the coverage of the topic. I recommend a merge and redirect. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 18:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

No response. I will assume no objection and do the merges.• • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 15:55, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Merges done. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 16:52, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

B-Class review[edit]

B-Class article B 
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
    More citations would be preferred, but I dont think anything is controversial.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
    OK, though the policies of more training organisations would be an improvement.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
    Structure looks appropriate. YesY
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
    Looks OK. YesY
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
    More images would be nice if they become available, but there is one, and it is not an easy topic to illustrate. Good enough. YesY
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
    Looks OK. YesY

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emergency ascent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)