Talk:Enchylium limosum/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Xkalponik (talk · contribs) 20:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Wolverine XI (talk · contribs) 10:22, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I should finish the review today. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 10:22, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- This characteristic often leads to its colonizing environments disrupted by human activity. Doesn't make sense
- E. limosum is often underestimated and overlooked Why such phrasing?
- The conservation status of E. limosum presents a nuanced picture that varies across different regions. Needs explanation
- Swedish botanist Erik Acharius Rm Swedish botanist
- it was reassigned by various taxonomists, and received its current accepted name Enchylium limosum in 2013 by Mónica Andrea García Otálora, Per Magnus Jørgensen, & Mats Wedin. Sketchy phrasing
- Synonyms for it have included Collema forissii Szatala, Collema glaucescens Hoffm., Collema viscosum A. Massal., and others. Please improve the phrasing
- The species Enchylium limosum, commonly known as lime-loving tarpaper lichen,[1] derives its name from its original classification as Collema limosum, attributed to the Swedish botanist Erik Acharius. Both scientific and common names? *Synonymy section is not needed
- Finally, the altitudinal distribution of Rm finally
- Commonness and rarity is not a good section name
- The conservation status of the lichen species Enchylium limosum varies considerably across its known geographic range, with limited and sometimes conflicting assessments available. Unsourced
- Ref 23 needs fixing
- Could you add ISSNs for all the journal citations Should be done now. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 08:00, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Xkalponik: checking in. It looks like things here have been stalled for a month. Do you still have time/interest to work through this? If not, we can archive this review. Best, Ajpolino (talk) 12:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- As Xkalponik is now Xoak, pinging again just in case the previous ping didn't go through; this makes two nominations that are in a similar state. (Note that archiving the review means that it is closed as unsuccessful, not held for later. A renomination can be done at a later date.) BlueMoonset (talk) 01:09, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset Please see my response here. X (talk) 12:51, 6 August 2024 (UTC)