Talk:Enlisted rank

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Can someone offer an explanation of how this particular term ("enlisted") came to be used for this purpose? It has always seemed to me that the simple meaning of "enlisted man" is to exclude those who have been drafted into the service. --Keeves 18:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Enlisted/Other Ranks entries for other Nation's militaries link to this page. Should this article be more general and not just about the U.S. Military? Sharkbait784 21:36, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The term "enlisted" exists in apposition to the authority of commissioned officers or the commissioned commander of a military unit. In Western or European Militaries Commanders and officers typically hold a "commission" from the sovereign. That is, they exercise some of the authority and responsibility of the sovereign for a limited or specific purpose. In the case of the Army or Navy, the purpose is the raising and maintenance of military forces. Commissioned officers hold their authority, and responsibility, at the will and pleasure of the sovereign. Technically no officer holding a commission may resign that commission without the approval of the sovereign. A commission is permanent until revoked.

In the United States Commissions are granted by Public Law, passed by Congress and signed by the President. In the United Kingdom they are granted by Parliament and the Queen.

The distinction is important for this discussion. Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, and Airmen are enlisted, named on the company list by a commissioned officer, for a fixed term: five years; the duration of the war; the duration of voyage; etc., etc. By being "Enlisted" the soldier is bound to the command of officers, and the officer commanding could the draw pay and rations for the "enlisted" soldiers or seaman. How they were enlisted, voluntary or by draft or empressment, did not matter. Being on the roles matters.

In common modern usage in Western Military Services the term "enlisted" applies to those volunteers or draftees that do not have a commission and whose term is fixed by law or contract with the sovereign. Non Commissioned Officers are enlisted personnel who are authorized subordinate privilege and responsibility for the order and discipline of other enlisted personnel. Typically they are appointed by Warrant from an authorized Commissioned Officer. In the United States that warrant is signed by the Service Secretary (Secretary of the Navy, Army, Air Force, or Homeland Security or Health and Human Service for the Coast Guard and Public Health Service) although in United States during time of war a Non Commissioned Officer can be appointed or promoted by a Commanding Officer subject to review by the Service Secretaries.

I know you need a citation for this and I will look for one. I learned this while in military service, the Blue Jackets Manual is a good source. Arnhout Zwingley

E-10

Isn't the Sergeant Major of the Army / Marine Corps, etc. an E-10?

Thedrewid314 04:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)thedrewid314[reply]

No. He's an E-9, but has a special symbol within his stripes to indicate his position.67.100.218.210 (talk) 02:01, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chairman (SEAC)

The rank chart is missing the abbreviation SEAC in the E-9 category for the Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Ncohistory (talk) 20:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Enlisted"

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Enlisted rank. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]