Talk:Falsity

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• False statement
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:False statement

Disambiguation

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Law

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles

Merge with Truth

Support — Appears to be a good idea at the moment. Right now this article gives short shrift to the logical and factual meanings, with a bulky list of ethical infractions, some of them borderline or outright specious, e.g. "prying into the correspondence of others", which would seem more antithetical to honour or trustworthiness than to truth. Of course, if the antonym section of Truth grows beyond a certain size it will be time to split it out again.

One example of factual falsity would be a musical string whose overtones do not ring true with the fundamental note. "Truth" in this case is physically impossible to attain, although most newly manufactured strings come close enough for all practical purposes. __ Just plain Bill (talk) 20:03, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, the emancipation of dissonance, where no tone rings ever really rings true, and all music is falsity.HkFnsNGA (talk) 19:01, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - There may be more to falsity than can fit into a truth article. But then, I was one of Alonzo Church's students, and I may have a "warped" perspective. For example, "warped" would be better discussed under "falsity", than "truth". I suggest asking the merge question at the "truth" talk page to get more opinions.HkFnsNGA (talk) 18:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'Vonkwo gist'?

On 6 January 2019 at 13:33, the first line 'Falsity (from Latin falsitas) or falsehood is...' was changed to 'Falsity (from Latin falsitas) or vonkwo gist is...' - I've never heard of 'vonkwo gist' and can't find any other reputable reference to it online. Since it's survived a number of revisions, is there anything to it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.174.8.204 (talk) 16:17, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]