Jump to content

Talk:Filth and Wisdom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Review

[edit]

Didn't this film receive consistently awful reviews? Should they be mentioned? Kate e kate e (talk) 15:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

. yes, the film was panned but Madonna fans are Wikipedia vandals so this page should be locked as I've entered the film reviews in twice and seen them removed by whiny madonna bots. Catherine Hubescher (User talk: Catherine Huebscher) 06:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As there are 2 positive reviews on the actual wiki page then it was not panned but received mixed reviews Voodoorocksteady —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.113.167 (talk) 05:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it fair to call it a "widely panned" film? Rotten Tomatoes shows three reviews, and all three are positive. Glamking —Preceding undated comment was added at 15:54, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello two years ago. More reviews for the film have come in since. It's much more negative now. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:05, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Filth and Wisdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Filth and Wisdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Filth_and_Wisdom&oldid=1204944526"