Talk:Final Fantasy Adventure/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Result: delisted: 23:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Promoted in 2006, it now looks like it doesn't meet the standards. It has a short Plot and setting (it doesn't really talk about the setting), many sections that looks un-referenced, and both pictures have problems with them too. Give me your thoughts. GamerPro64 (talk) 02:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Honestly I'm not even sure how it passed GAN in this form.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 19:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Sparse referencing and the reception being based on a couple of retrospective reviews are deal-breakers. The reader is not getting an accurate picture of how the game was actually received at the time of release. Someone another 14:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Since two people say delist and that its been over a week since Reassessment, its now delisted. GamerPro64 (talk) 23:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]