Talk:Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
What problems?
[edit]what are some problem
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120125120635/http://www.gulfbase.org/reef/view.php?rid=fgb1 to http://www.gulfbase.org/reef/view.php?rid=fgb1
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120125120635/http://www.gulfbase.org/reef/view.php?rid=fgb1 to http://www.gulfbase.org/reef/view.php?rid=fgb1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Remove the "rewrite" tag?
[edit]Reasons to do so: 1) it's old - 2009; 2) no editor has posted anything here to back up the objections; 3) no one has pointed to the source of the "copied" text; 4) no one has explained what makes the section "US-slanted" to an objectionable extent. It is, after all, a US government entity.
I propose to wait a month or so for clarification of the objections, then remove the tag. WCCasey (talk) 21:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- I rewrote it and cleaned things up a bit. Next the article needs much better sourcing! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 19:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)