Talk:Folie à Deux (The X-Files)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 02:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
I'll take this one for review. Let's read some X-Files. TBrandley 02:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Lede: Link science fiction
- Lede: The episode originally aired in the United States on May 10, 1998 on the Fox network → The episode originally aired on the Fox network on May 10, 1998
- I rearranged this, but left the part about the United States. You've suggested I add that before, and I don't want to have to go through the other articles, since removing it wouldn't match.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Lede: Quotes shouldn't be inside the monster-of-week link, but outside of it
- Lede: in its initial broadcast → upon its initial broadcast
- Lede: It received largely positive reviews from critics, with many commenting upon its creepiness. → It received largely positive reviews, with many critics commenting upon the installment's creepiness.
- Plot: "Dana Scully" is?
- Done. Add that she's his partner.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Plot: As per MOS:ACRO, please write out SWAT fully on the first mention, then write (SWAT)
- Production: Unlink Folie à deux; it's already linked above in "Plot"
- Production: "In fact," is not needed.
- Production: "North Vancouver, British Columbia" should be two separate links
- Reception: → Broadcast and reception. To match with other ep. articles
- Reception: premiered → originally aired
- Reception: "Folie à Deux" premiered on the Fox network on May 10, 1998. The episode later debuted in the United Kingdom on BBC One on March 10, 1999 → "Folie à Deux" premiered on the Fox network on May 10, 1998, and was first broadcast in the United Kingdom on BBC One on March 10, 1999
- Reception: "Todd VanDerWerff" of who? Surely his writing for someone, The A.V. Club?
- References: Ref. 13: pp should just be p, like the others
- Since it covers more than one page, the correct format is to write "pp".--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- External links: on → at
- External links: Categories should be sorted in alphebitcal order below please.
Overall; like all others, a great article. In good shape, once the issues are fixed, I will be happy to pass. Cheers, TBrandley 16:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- I've addressed all the issues. Thank you for reviewing.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good. I'll pass the article. TBrandley 02:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- I've addressed all the issues. Thank you for reviewing.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)