Talk:Forbury Gardens
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Forbury Hill, Matilda and Stephen
[edit]The article contains the following:
- In 1150, what is now Forbury Hill was constructed to help fortify the Abbey during the war between King Henry I's daughter, Matilda, and his nephew, Stephen
which was added back in 2006 by an editor who hasn't made any edits since 2007.
Trouble is, I cannot find any cites for it. All the obvious reference works (Daphne Phillips, Cecil Slade, etc) make no mention of Forbury Hill until the Civil War. I must say that I have some sympathy with the Stephen/Matilda theory; to my untutored eye the hill looks much more like a Norman motte than a Civil War earthwork. But without any cites, I fear that paragraph is going to have to come out.
Can anybody help throw any light?. -- Starbois (talk) 11:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Forbury Gardens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927181703/http://www.reading.gov.uk/leisureandculture/parksandopenspaces/forburygardens/General.asp?id=SX9452-A783E204 to http://www.reading.gov.uk/leisureandculture/parksandopenspaces/forburygardens/General.asp?id=SX9452-A783E204
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110225141447/http://www.reading.gov.uk/leisureandculture/historyofreading/forburygardensrestorationproject/ to http://www.reading.gov.uk/leisureandculture/historyofreading/forburygardensrestorationproject/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927181644/http://www.reading.gov.uk/leisureandculture/historyofreading/forburygardensrestorationproject/General.asp?id=SX9452-A7800F99 to http://www.reading.gov.uk/leisureandculture/historyofreading/forburygardensrestorationproject/General.asp?id=SX9452-A7800F99
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927181656/http://www.reading.gov.uk/latest/mediareleases/PressArticle.asp?id=SX9452-A784D6D8 to http://www.reading.gov.uk/latest/mediareleases/PressArticle.asp?id=SX9452-A784D6D8
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110807125828/http://ww2.reading.gov.uk/documents/cultural-leisure/Forbury%20Gardens%20Restoration%20Project.pdf to http://ww2.reading.gov.uk/documents/cultural-leisure/Forbury%20Gardens%20Restoration%20Project.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 23 December 2017 (UTC)