Talk:Frank (magazine)

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Often compared to Private Eye? By whom? The only similarity between PE and Frank is that they are (well, were, in the case of the now-defunct Frank) printed on cheap paper --scruss 11:51, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They had a recent news item blasting Wikipedia. They gave specific examples of inaccuracies in Wikipedia articles on several Canadian news people. It seems convenient that they should turn these up just in time to be included in their magazine. Were they there all along or did someone anonymously plant them for Frank to find?---rvitelli 12 February 2007

Recent Citations needed tags

What is the controversy? Just pick up any issue of Frank and you will see them refer to Conrad Black as Tubby Black. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 14:37, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Frank (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070814165917/http://www.rrj.ca:80/online/588/ to http://www.rrj.ca/online/588/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:07, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]