Talk:Furry Vengeance

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Furry Vengeance article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The Plot

Someone should rewrite the plot. Doesn't seem very well written. I'm still not sure what the movie is about. Mishathegreat (talk) 20:40, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Moved from Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Unpublished source being edit-warred into the article by someone using the IP range Special:Contributions/2604:6000:130E:49B0:0:0:0:0/64, blocked a month ago for personal attacks. Binksternet (talk) 01:33, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source ISN'T unpublished. The ref has a link for you to download the DOC file. If it wasn't published, it wouldn't have been findable via a Google search. Defamatory, poor faith claim from Binksternet. 2604:6000:130E:49B0:2836:E38E:4ADB:8B5 (talk) 01:53, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you still don't believe Annaliese Zuzarte wrote and published production notes for the film, then do this. Click the link of the Zuzarte citation (http://static.thecia.com.au/reviews/f/furry-vengeance-production-notes.doc), download it, load it in a viewer, and look at the first page, specifically the text under "PUBLICITY:" 2604:6000:130E:49B0:2836:E38E:4ADB:8B5 (talk) 01:56, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, how in the world does an unrelated incident from a month ago factor into this? 2604:6000:130E:49B0:2836:E38E:4ADB:8B5 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:17, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Cinematic Intelligence Agency has the look and feel of someone's fan-site. Citing someone's fan-site as a reference for film is sub-optimal, but pretty-ho-hum. It is reasonable to presume the document in question's copyright is held by its writer's at the time employer, NIXCo, "a global arts and entertainment consultancy specialising in strategic public relations and marketing". Citing material that is being hosted in violation of copyright: now that is a big deal. It's a Saturday afternoon, so - back in a few hours. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 04:31, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"has the look and feel of someone's fan-site." That doesn't mean it is, though (Facts don't care about your feelings). Although, it's the only site where the production notes are publicly available. With that said, the fact that a "fan-site" (we're only assuming, here) has the production notes at all indicates the production notes were publicly released at some point, indicating that it is.... Published 2604:6000:130E:49B0:2836:E38E:4ADB:8B5 (talk) 04:42, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

However, if this was being removed for reasonings of a "copyright violation," that actually would've been a clearer and more understandable reason. The reason of "unpublished" just didn't make any sense. 2604:6000:130E:49B0:2836:E38E:4ADB:8B5 (talk) 04:44, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With all of this said, how are we gonna cite the production notes, because there's a chunk of how the movie was made that's ONLY in that source? Do we just have to remove the URL? 2604:6000:130E:49B0:2836:E38E:4ADB:8B5 (talk) 04:59, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To start with, see WP:LINKVIO.

"With all of this said, how are we gonna cite the production notes, because there's a chunk of how the movie was made that's ONLY in that source? Do we just have to remove the URL?"

Short answer: yes, we remove the URL, and possibly block the user who keeps adding the URL of a website that doesn't own the cited document. I'm in the process of drafting up a longer reply.--Shirt58 (talk) 08:34, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll stop adding the URL with this knowledge in mind, know, I swear. I don't need to be blocked for what was a misunderstanding 2604:6000:130E:49B0:54C5:2D3D:E4AE:514A (talk) 14:06, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Black comedy?

What exactly makes this a black comedy? There have been many children's films about a guy getting routinely physically abused, and I don't see anyone calling these black comedies. SparksRain (talk) 14:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]