Talk:G-Spot amplification

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 January 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Prod for deletion[edit]

I'm prodding this article for deletion because none of the references here show any evidence that this is WP:NOTABLE, and none of the references are WP:RELIABLE SOURCES. Jefffire (talk) 19:31, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I deprodded after finding additional refs at G News Archive: [1]. There is also one PubMed references: [2] from an absolutely reliable journal (which calls it "G-spot amplification"). I have changed the title accordingly,. DGG ( talk ) 04:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is a vast improvement. The previous article just looked like an ad for the company. Jefffire (talk) 20:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Like I stated in this edit summary, I "[m]erged G-Spot amplification into [the G-Spot] article as there isn't enough material on the topic, especially medical material, for th[is] article to significantly grow beyond what it was. Not to mention, medical authorities are against the surgery." Flyer22 (talk) 02:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]