Talk:GABA receptor antagonist
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What in God's name...
[edit]"GABA receptor antagonists are good because"
Good "at", "for", "because" - no idea, perhaps just plain "unqualified good".
This is science & biochemistry not morality & philosophy. James James 173 (talk) 07:19, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Merger proposal
[edit]It is claimed that this article cannot be expanded to a traditionally non-stub length without creating significant redundancy in the GABA and Receptor antagonist pages.
Therefore, it should be merged with a subsection of at least one of those articles to avoid unnecessary division of content.
The specifics of the merger are left unspecified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevia badger (talk • contribs) 19:17, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the GABA receptor antagonist page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "GABA receptor antagonist" page.