Talk:GS1-128

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Code 128
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Code 128

The data section in the first example ("Overview" section) does not contains 18 characters as stated for the code "00" (Serial Shipping Container Code).

Corrected Nim278 (talk) 17:15, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reduced to Clear (Repricing) labels in retail

A number of UK-based retailers (certainly the top 5 grocery, and one major home improvement chain) use an Code128/GS1-128 to reprice items in store by the each, for example, to reduce the price of a specific item because it is damaged or nearing it's sell buy/use by/best before date. The label is usually self-adhesive and stuck over the products barcode, with additional copies being stuck on the front of the product to alert the customer to the damage/reduction

The label usually has a number below it, to allow manual keying in case it does not scan (there is a significant rate of scan failure due to dirt, thermal fade, or printer/stationery inaccuracies).

The number format is retailer specific, but often starts with starts with a 9, and usually embeds the GTIN and price in a fairly obvious way. It sometimes also embeds an do not sell after day of week or day of month which will be checked by the cash register. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.60.169 (talk) 12:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Application Identifiers

A lot of content had to be removed due to a very historic plagiarism of http://www.barcodeisland.com/uccean128.phtml by 117.97.1.175 on "20:08, 15 May 2010" although the "source" site also looks suspect. Found http://www.gs1-128.info/ai-values/ to contain a very similar table but seems a much stronger source?

Quite a few changes had been made to the descriptive part of that section but separating the original from copies is just far too tricky. Any suggestions how this should be handled and thoughts if that content was useful?

What exactly is a "..very historic.." plagiarism?

--75.73.1.89 (talk) 02:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on GS1-128. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110901211015/http://www.gs1-128.info:80/ to http://www.gs1-128.info/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]