Talk:Garbage Museum/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 21:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC) This is too weird a subject not to review. How many times can one review an article about a garbage museum? -- Zanimum (talk) 21:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
This sounds like it was (and could be again, if it got a few hundred more in funding) a great institution. Sad that it's not running currently.
Passing "Lead", "References", "External links".
Operation
- "which transported recyclables" is the SCRC itself no longer active?
Exhibits
- "Educational exhibits focus on the benefits of recycling soda cans reduces air pollution and water pollution than mining bauxite." I think you need a comma or two, and a joining word or two. This all seems to run into itself.
- Sorry, am I reading that correct, that someone worked 9 months on a $2000 project? Was that just $2000 for the labour? Or just the materials? If that's both labour and materials, that's crazy.
Closure
- "funded two 2.5 full-time positions" doesn't make sense. 2 makes sense, 2.5 makes sense not 2 2.5.
You had a cat for the disestablishment, I've added one for the establishment. -- Zanimum (talk) 12:37, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- I've fixed these things myself. Passing. -- Zanimum (talk) 23:57, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- @Zanimum: Thanks! Sorry, was on vacation! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:36, 18 July 2014 (UTC)