Talk:Garry Schyman/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 17:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- Article is well written and complies to MoS.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- References appear to comply to WP:RS and all major statements are properly cited.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- The article appears to be stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Unfortunately there are no images available, however, this is not a requirement of GA.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Summary: There are no issues with this article, and it passes all the requirements on the checklist. As such, I am happy to pass this as a Good Article. -- S Masters (talk) 17:27, 10 April 2010 (UTC)